Development pressures in Howard County are nothing new. The quality of life enjoyed by residents is among the highest in the United States. Such pressure leads to innovative development proposals, one of which is playing out in Ellicott City; the rezoning request and Planned Service Area Amendment on Camilla and Philip Carroll’s property at Doughoregan Manor. Or, as the Carroll’s development team like to refer to it as, “The Deal.” Their deal goes something like this: If you rezone the easternmost 221 acres of our property to quadruple the number of houses we can build on it, we will allow the taxpayers to give us more than $18 million for the development rights to most of the remainder. Of course, we will continue to own that portion and collect rent from our tenant farmers. But if you don’t do what we want, we’re going to do something really bad to you: Develop the entire 817-acre site by right with over 400 one-acre lots served by well and septic. The last time most of us heard that kind of “deal” was on a schoolyard playground. This isn’t a case of having your cake and eating it too, the Carrolls want to have their cake, eat one, and have three more waiting for them in the butler’s pantry. What a deal!
We have heard many times in the course of the dialog about how important Doughoregan and the Carrolls are and how their family patriarch, Charles Carroll of Carrollton (“The Signer”) was instrumental to the founding of our country. He was, after all, one of four Marylanders to sign the Declaration of Independence. And we don’t dispute that. But that is just as irrelevant to the matter at hand as the fact that the Carrolls also happened to be one of the largest (if not the largest) slaveholders in the State or that The Signer’s Grandson, Col. Charles Carroll, sent two of his sons to fight (and one to die) in defense of the genteel plantation lifestyle made possible by human bondage as officers in the Army of the Confederacy.
According to the Carrols, the only way to save Doughoregan Manor from the ravages of time is to approve the deal. But there is one hitch: In order to accommodate that great an increase in development, they would be required to hook up to the public sewer system. Unfortunately, according to the County Department of Public Works, the existing treatment facility would not be able to handle the additional nitrogen nutrient load. The solution? Build a sewage treatment plant on the site, naturally. So we lucky neighbors not only get four times the traffic and school impacts, we also get the toxic chemicals and odors of a sewage treatment plant in our neighborhood. And how will the plant get built? According to the Carroll’s development team, “that will have to be negotiated” but they are willing to pay “their fair share.” This deal just gets better and better!
Fear not, you might say, there is no way the Howard County Council, acting as the Zoning Board, would let this happen. But in an article in the Baltimore Sun when the “deal” was first reported (“Carrolls Propose a New Plan for Doughoregan” September 20, 2009), our elected representative sounds less like our councilwoman and more like the spokeswoman for the developer:
“It’s not a question of whether homes will be built there, but how they will be built,” said County Councilwoman Courtney Watson, a Democrat who represents the area. “I’m glad there is a viable option on the table for a comprehensive solution.”
Of course, now that her constituents are contacting her with their concerns, she is unable to comment on the case.
We owe the Carrolls a debt of gratitude for their stewardship of the land. But we do not owe them, or any other private property owner, zoning to ensure financial certitude. If the $18 million from the taxpayers of Howard County is not enough, let them develop the 221 acres under the existing zoning, without the sewage treatment plant. Otherwise, we fear what started as a discussion about saving “The Carroll’s Doughoregan Manor’ will become an abject lesson in saving “The Carroll’s Dough-raking Manner.” The citizens of Howard County deserve better than this “viable option” and “comprehensive solution.” And the voters in the First Councilmanic District will be watching whether our elected officials can tell the difference between a good deal and a bad one. Do we have a deal?
independent, if that was the case, TAG's effort would have succeeded. But...
Posted in I have faith the people can defeat the developer-backed Goliath
Most voters did not agree this was a good plan, but our...
Posted in I have faith the people can defeat the developer-backed Goliath
Enforcement of the GGP plan is optional. The plan could be...
Posted in If education is Sigaty's priority, she has odd way of showing it